Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory18GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 18GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory15.1 GB free of 18 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '17 at 17:41
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2-$266
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 100
2-Core 192
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 488
51% 410 Pts
64-Core 477
30% 477 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3201) 2GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 372.70
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35.3% Below average
Lighting 46
Reflection 43.4
Parallax 39.5
38% 43 fps
MRender 40.4
Gravity 39.8
Splatting 35.1
31% 38.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 506ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 357
Write 182
Mixed 186
53% 242 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 15.1
86% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 50.6
66% 117 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 87%
Hitachi HDN726040ALE614 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: APGNW7JH Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 204
Write 199
Mixed 198
151% 200 MB/s
4K Read 0.98
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.57
141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 115%
Great: 113%
Seagate ST250DM001 HD253GJ 250GB
184GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 131
Write 131
Mixed 126
97% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 2.56
4K Mixed 0.54
135% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 76%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
81GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 122
Write 127
Mixed 121
93% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 2.13
4K Mixed 0.17
86% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8GX KHX1600C10D3/8GX 859B CT25664BA160B.C8FE 18GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.8% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 15.9
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $158

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $488
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback