Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-7480 Radeon R5, 8 Compute Cores 2C+6G 2,203 User benchmarks, average bench 34% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	42.1% Average	Memory 72.4 1-Core 67.9 2-Core 100 51% 80.2 Pts	4-Core 69.5 8-Core 85.4 10% 77.4 Pts	64-Core 103 6% 103 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 44%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 308 266 71 60 47 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	53.2% Above average	Read 331 Write 286 Mixed 257 SusWrite 177 59% 263 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 58.9 4K Mixed 16.6 90% 33.3 MB/s	DQ Read 29.8 DQ Write 92.1 DQ Mixed 22.4 28% 48.1 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 92%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 4GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 9 8.9 4.6 4.6 4.9 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Read 23 Write 9 Mixed 5 SusWrite 6.7 12% 10.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 2.1 146% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS2G3D1609DS 2x2GB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.3% Poor	MC Read 10.1 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 12.1 29% 10 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 6.8 16% 5.47 GB/s	Latency 96.1 42% 96.1 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	80x
Radeon HD 8470DAMDBench 3%, 8,268 samples	29x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	28x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	14x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 7,567 samples	14x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 4,775 samples	11x

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16