Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	112GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 112GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 4,306 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Memory 79.8 1-Core 68.8 2-Core 137 58% 95.3 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 480 44% 370 Pts	64-Core 1,299 80% 1,299 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 5000 751 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Nvidia(10DE 0770) 2.5GB CLim: 513 MHz, MLim: 747 MHz, Ram: 2.5GB, Driver: 377.83 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Lighting 12.6 Reflection 18.9 Parallax 13.7 10% 15 fps	MRender 22 Gravity 9.87 Splatting 16 13% 15.9 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ48 480GB 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: 6101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 177 179 180 187 176 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53.5% Above average	Read 235 Write 207 Mixed 202 SusWrite 182 46% 207 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 34.2 4K Mixed 25.8 85% 27.4 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 115 DQ Mixed 137 105% 143 MB/s

Seagate ST2000NM0011 2TB-$60 4,076 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 1.5TB free Firmware: PA07 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 136 133 136 139 138 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	78.8% Very good	Read 139 Write 128 Mixed 70 SusWrite 136 87% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 188% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 86%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 32GB-$27 3,642 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 0GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 26.9 Write 5.7 14% 16.3 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.8 52% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung-00CE M393B2G70BH0-CK0 M393B1K70DH0-CK0 M393B1K70DH0-CK0 M393B1K70DH0-CK0 M393B1K70DH0-CK0 M393B1K70DH0-CK0 M393B2G70BH0-CK0 M393B1K70DH0-CK0... 112GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 16384, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 16384, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	61.5% Good	MC Read 26.7 MC Write 23.3 MC Mixed 22 69% 24 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 7.1 23% 7.9 GB/s	Latency 80.8 50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 62%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	92x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	76x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 01stBench 67%, 1,642 samples	75x

GPU
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	39x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	36x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	33x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	26x
MX500 500GBCrucial $55Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	21x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	19x

RAM
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsung-00CEBench 79%, 545 samples	33x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GBHynix-00ADBench 78%, 761 samples	28x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 8x8GBHynix-00ADBench 87%, 150 samples	26x

Value: 26% - Poor

Total price: $90

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16