. .

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics22.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
System. .  (all builds)
Motherboardhttp://www.abit.com.tw/ IP35 Pro(Intel P35-ICH9R)
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '20 at 07:08
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E6750
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
46.5% Average
Memory 81.2
1-Core 36.8
2-Core 73.3
44% 63.8 Pts
4-Core 73.3
8-Core 73.5
10% 73.4 Pts
64-Core 74.1
5% 74.1 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 360-$100
Gigabyte(1458 22C7) 2GB
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.4% Poor
Lighting 26.5
Reflection 33.6
Parallax 35.5
22% 31.8 fps
MRender 28.3
Gravity 24.5
Splatting 33.7
24% 28.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB
528GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 123 127 125 126 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 171
Write 168
Mixed 89.6
SusWrite 125
31% 138 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 0.7
17% 5.87 MB/s
DQ Read 1
DQ Write 10.3
DQ Mixed 1.1
2% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 23%
Volume2 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 258 238 212 228 208 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 32% Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
23.8% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 7
21% 7.43 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 6.4
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical . Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: . .

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback