. .

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics22.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
System. .  (all builds)
Motherboardhttp://www.abit.com.tw/ IP35 Pro(Intel P35-ICH9R)
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080526
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 24 '20 at 10:17
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E6750
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
46.1% Average
Memory 80.3
1-Core 36.8
2-Core 73.3
43% 63.5 Pts
4-Core 73.3
8-Core 73.6
10% 73.4 Pts
64-Core 73.4
4% 73.4 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 360-$100
Gigabyte(1458 22C7) 2GB
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.4% Poor
Lighting 26.4
Reflection 33.6
Parallax 35.2
22% 31.7 fps
MRender 28.4
Gravity 24.5
Splatting 33.7
24% 28.9 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB
529GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 123 127 125 126 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 175
Write 165
Mixed 90.2
SusWrite 125
31% 139 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 0.8
11% 4.47 MB/s
DQ Read 1
DQ Write 10.7
DQ Mixed 1.3
2% 4.33 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 23%
Volume2 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 274 300 291 299 315 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 32% Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
24% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 7.1
21% 7.47 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 7.5
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 24%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical . Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: . .

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback