MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics90.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190612
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '20 at 02:27
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 84.8
1-Core 122
2-Core 243
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 917
84% 701 Pts
64-Core 1,325
82% 1,325 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.8% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 115
Parallax 120
94% 117 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 101
Splatting 83
85% 107 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 908 748 823 645 575 555 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 1,483
Write 1,300
Mixed 1,229
SusWrite 709
265% 1,180 MB/s
4K Read 62.3
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 81
264% 89.3 MB/s
DQ Read 971
DQ Write 795
DQ Mixed 882
661% 883 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 224%
Great: 355%
Apacer AS340 240GB
159GB free
Firmware: AP613PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 189 111 108 138 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 318
Write 117
Mixed 263
SusWrite 174
49% 218 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 67.4
4K Mixed 36.2
134% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 159
124% 169 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 95%
Lexar SSD 480GB
79GB free
Firmware: R1126A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 359 432 435 432 434 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 481
Write 418
Mixed 358
SusWrite 409
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 65.9
4K Mixed 22.6
114% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 36.6
67% 134 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 217%
Lexar SSD 480GB
28GB free
Firmware: R1126A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 358 430 431 365 243 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 481
Write 415
Mixed 357
SusWrite 365
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 65.8
4K Mixed 22.7
114% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 36.6
67% 134 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 217%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
423GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 121 123 122 117 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 111
Write 120
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 121
69% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 44
MC Write 40.6
MC Mixed 38.2
117% 40.9 GB/s
SC Read 30.2
SC Write 41.8
SC Mixed 34.7
102% 35.6 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 113%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 6,098 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $980
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback