Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	75.2% Very good	Memory 82.2 1-Core 106 2-Core 210 75% 133 Pts	4-Core 396 8-Core 384 52% 390 Pts	64-Core 395 24% 395 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199 77,943 User benchmarks, average bench 27% XFX(1682 9275) 2GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.9.2 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	29.5% Poor	Lighting 37.3 Reflection 33.5 Parallax 48.7 30% 39.8 fps	MRender 29.3 Gravity 32.8 Splatting 37.7 28% 33.3 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 217GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5,099 Write 4,302 Mixed 4,499 1,032% 4,633 MB/s	4K Read 252 4K Write 137 4K Mixed 170 672% 186 MB/s	DQ Read 789 DQ Write 680 DQ Mixed 736 551% 735 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4.5TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 41 27 28 42 24 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	41.7% Average	Read 110 Write 63.9 Mixed 66 SusWrite 33.4 51% 68.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 0.2 150% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8F Nanya NT4GC64B88B1NF-DI 859B CT51264BA160BJ.C8F Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 16GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	57.3% Above average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 21.8 MC Mixed 17.6 57% 20 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 18 SC Mixed 16.4 49% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 76.5 52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	2,212x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	997x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	946x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	230x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	159x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4x4GBMicronBench 56%, 6,584 samples	152x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87