Asus H81M-A/BR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive23.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-A/BR  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '20 at 18:16
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 92.3
1-Core 110
2-Core 221
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 418
57% 422 Pts
64-Core 418
26% 418 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 63 58 104 34 129 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.4% Poor
Read 169
Write 94.1
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 96.8
25% 111 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 13.4
4K Mixed 8.1
33% 10.6 MB/s
DQ Read 16.5
DQ Write 17.5
DQ Mixed 15
12% 16.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 100%
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154
34GB free
Firmware: 1118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 56 57 57 58 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 95.4
Write 62.2
Mixed 50.4
SusWrite 57.1
49% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SH564568FH8N0TNSDG Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 10GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.3% Good
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 18.7
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 19.2
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-A/BR Builds (Compare 438 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-A/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $127
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback