ADD TO PC
BUILD

Eurocom Shark 7R2

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.81% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	92.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Eurocom Shark 7R2 (all builds)
Motherboard	EUROCOM Shark 7R2
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160222
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 20 '17 at 05:20
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	Memory 77.7 1-Core 103 2-Core 189 71% 123 Pts	4-Core 366 8-Core 519 56% 443 Pts	64-Core 545 34% 545 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Clevo(1558 0152) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4534 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	5.81% Terrible	Lighting 6.03 Reflection 36.3 Parallax 5.81 5% 16.1 fps	MRender 8.05 Gravity 5.17 Splatting 12.9 8% 8.71 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.81% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKKW120H6 120GB 388 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: LSBG100 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 135 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 660 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 48 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 71 103083868220 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 48 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 68927 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 0 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 0 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 97 97 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 68927 (F2) Unknown 100 100 64381 (F9) Unknown 100 100 1230 (FC) Unknown 100 100 17	92.3% Outstanding	Read 503 Write 322 Mixed 358 87% 394 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 82.6 4K Mixed 38.3 135% 49.5 MB/s	DQ Read 270 DQ Write 214 DQ Mixed 79.9 104% 188 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 93%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125 56,661 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 255GB free Firmware: GH2OA420 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 236 236 77309411329 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 2164 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 2629 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1032 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 27 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 90 90 106275 (C2) HDA temperature 200 200 279173595166 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 19 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 352 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	66.1% Good	Read 107 Write 123 Mixed 107 85% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 0.2 74% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 72%
Toshiba MK7559GSXF 750GB 1,514 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 43GB free Firmware: GQ005B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1928 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 14665 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 55 55 18323 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 8643 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 2251 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 2223 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 1066044 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 219043725344 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 4 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 52 (DE) Loaded hours 72 72 11368 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 327 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (FE) Unknown 100 100 512	33.7% Below average	Read 56.8 Write 60.4 Mixed 58 44% 58.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 1.43 4K Mixed 0.19 62% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1866C11S3L/8G 1315 CT102464BF186D.M16 16GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 1867, 1867 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	63.9% Good	MC Read 24 MC Write 24.4 MC Mixed 19.7 65% 22.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 22.7 SC Mixed 20.2 55% 19.4 GB/s	Latency 84.9 47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 66%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback