Hp-pavilion WC963AA-ABF p6355fr

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Hp-pavilion WC963AA-ABF p6355fr (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI IONA
Memory	9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100625
Uptime	6.6 Days
Run Date	Oct 24 '20 at 13:36
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	68.8% Good	Memory 93.2 1-Core 79.4 2-Core 147 66% 106 Pts	4-Core 242 8-Core 358 37% 300 Pts	64-Core 355 22% 355 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760 (192-bit) 10,656 User benchmarks, average bench 20% MSI(1462 284B) 1.5GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	20% Very poor	Lighting 23.1 Reflection 24.1 Parallax 30.1 19% 25.8 fps	MRender 33 Gravity 27.8 Splatting 22.3 22% 27.7 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$15 42,924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900612 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 50 26 23 26 26 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.3% Below average	Read 50.3 Write 168 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 48.6 17% 73 MB/s	4K Read 6.9 4K Write 40.5 4K Mixed 17.8 55% 21.7 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 136 115% 166 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 87%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 89GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 70 68 69 68 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	35.4% Below average	Read 56.7 Write 44.2 Mixed 39 SusWrite 66.4 38% 51.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 57%
Asmedia ASM1153E 6TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 25 24 24 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Read 31.8 Write 25.3 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 24.2 20% 27.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 1.4 450% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 95%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 14GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.6 3.4 3.6 4.6 4.6 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Read 8.2 Write 5 Mixed 2 SusWrite 4.2 6% 4.85 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.7 151% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 17%
Generic External 2TB 294 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1TB free, PID 1340 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 25 25 24 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Read 20.5 Write 23.2 Mixed 22.5 SusWrite 24.1 32% 22.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 53% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 23%
HP Photosmart C6180 1GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 1% 0GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.98% Terrible	Read 1.2 Write 1.2 Mixed 1.2 SusWrite 1.3 2% 1.23 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.2 14% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.98% Great: 2%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	40.3% Average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 12.3 38% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 11.1 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 61.6 65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical WC963AA-ABF p6355fr Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion WC963AA-ABF p6355fr

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	17x
Core i3 530Intel $45Bench 46%, 16,724 samples	5x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 580Nvidia $450Bench 23%, 15,395 samples	10x
GTX 670Nvidia $435Bench 28%, 47,610 samples	5x
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples	1x

SSD
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	14x
S400 120GBKingdianBench 66%, 1,721 samples	2x
X300s SATA 128GBSanDiskBench 75%, 177 samples	1x

RAM
99U5458-001.A00LF 2x2GBUnknownBench 28%, 7 samples	2x
Atermiter01.A02LF AD80AD80 HMT125U6BFR8C-H9 4GBUnknownBench 31%, 3 samples	2x
M378B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GBCE80CE80Bench 39%, 417 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 19% - Very poor

Total price: $520

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16