Razer Blade

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Razer Blade (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer CH530
Memory	7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190709
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Oct 23 '20 at 15:50
Run Duration	225 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	64% Good	Memory 84.1 1-Core 74.9 2-Core 122 59% 93.7 Pts	4-Core 245 8-Core 315 36% 280 Pts	64-Core 192 12% 192 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1A58 2005) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8783 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	4.37% Terrible	Lighting 6.93 Reflection 15.4 Parallax 8.59 6% 10.3 fps	MRender 0.14 Gravity 7.33 Splatting 0.09 2% 2.52 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.37% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D512 512GB 4,424 User benchmarks, average bench 168% 375GB free (System drive) Firmware: C490903 SusWrite @10s intervals: 716 494 426 427 457 365 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	161% Outstanding	Read 1,447 Write 1,517 Mixed 1,189 SusWrite 481 260% 1,159 MB/s	4K Read 43.4 4K Write 75.1 4K Mixed 46.6 165% 55 MB/s	DQ Read 633 DQ Write 391 DQ Mixed 489 371% 504 MB/s
Poor: 98% ↑ This bench: 161% Great: 228%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 1TB 4,980 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 15GB free Firmware: 1012 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 206 Write 288 Mixed 180 50% 225 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 33.4 4K Mixed 23.2 76% 25.1 MB/s	DQ Read 104 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 99.4 78% 106 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 87%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 249GB 684 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 114GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 13 12 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 34.8 Write 29 Mixed 32 SusWrite 12.5 20% 27.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 72%
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 32GB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 12 12 12 11 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 36.5 Write 37 Mixed 31 SusWrite 11.6 38% 29 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 32%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB 7,850 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 54GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 3.7 3.7 4.5 4.8 4.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	8.66% Terrible	Read 24.5 Write 9.5 Mixed 14.5 SusWrite 3.9 15% 13.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1.6 106% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.66% Great: 18%
WDC WD50 00LUCT-62C26Y0 500GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 224GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 12 13 12 13 12 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 38.5 Write 37 Mixed 31.5 SusWrite 13 39% 30 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 19%
General UDisk 2TB 1,229 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 2TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 6.8 6.7 5.2 6.6 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	5.09% Terrible	Read 15.7 Write 2.5 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 6.2 10% 8.23 MB/s	4K Read 6.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 23% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.09% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB 43,895 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	MC Read 28.4 MC Write 31.1 MC Mixed 25.3 81% 28.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 26.3 SC Mixed 20 57% 19.8 GB/s	Latency 73.2 55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,052 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,076x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,072x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	473x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,456x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	599x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	401x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	824x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	288x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	249x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	1,769x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	372x
M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 2,214 samples	291x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16