Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '20 at 08:52
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$38
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 70.5
1-Core 85.8
2-Core 202
66% 119 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 305
37% 285 Pts
64-Core 303
19% 303 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 5912) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8783
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 4.93
Reflection 6.46
Parallax 0.06
4% 3.82 fps
Splatting 0.04
0% 0.04 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB
502GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 33 59 64 29 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 79.7
Write 66.7
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 43.5
42% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 61%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB
25GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 34 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Read 98.5
Write 36.2
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 23.8
60% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 2.4
168% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ronisys NB 8G 1600 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.9% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 6.4
20% 7 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 6.4
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,726 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback