Asus H81M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics37.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-E  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150618
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '20 at 04:23
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 93.6
2-Core 177
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 368
48% 360 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Lighting 49.4
Reflection 45
Parallax 40.5
40% 45 fps
MRender 39.5
Gravity 43.2
Splatting 37.3
32% 40 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Z400s 128GB-$109
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z220
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 160 164 164 152 164 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.9% Average
Read 235
Write 140
Mixed 137
SusWrite 159
38% 168 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 10.6
80% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 74
78% 128 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 71%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
292GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 113 113 115 115 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 137
Write 118
Mixed 89.9
SusWrite 114
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 109%
SPCC PHD 320GB
56GB free, PID 1d40
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 13 38 38 39 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 20.8
Write 4.3
Mixed 9
SusWrite 28.9
20% 15.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
48% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
59.6% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 18.4
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 18.9
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-E Builds (Compare 1,814 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-E - $311

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $548
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback