Asus H81M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics38.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-E  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150618
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 10 '20 at 04:52
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 92.6
2-Core 186
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 356
48% 357 Pts
64-Core 364
23% 364 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 76%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Lighting 50.6
Reflection 46.2
Parallax 40.2
41% 45.7 fps
MRender 39.5
Gravity 42.8
Splatting 37.1
32% 39.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Z400s 128GB-$109
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z220
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 156 150 162 163 167 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.8% Average
Read 234
Write 143
Mixed 136
SusWrite 155
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 69.7
4K Mixed 11.2
80% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 73.3
78% 128 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 71%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
301GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 114 114 114 115 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 130
Write 102
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 113
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
227% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 109%
SPCC PHD 320GB
56GB free, PID 1d40
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 12.3
Mixed 30
SusWrite 36.8
37% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
58.3% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 17.6
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 18
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-E Builds (Compare 1,814 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-E - $311

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $548
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback