Asus X580VD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus X580VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X580VD
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190416
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 22 '20 at 21:01
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 111
2-Core 215
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 596
60% 488 Pts
64-Core 588
36% 588 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1A10) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
3.46% Terrible
Lighting 6.43
Reflection 24.7
Parallax 6.5
5% 12.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.46%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30200P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 92 123 126 120 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 426
Write 127
Mixed 148
SusWrite 114
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 17.9
100% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 329
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 120
117% 192 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 70%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
779GB free
Firmware: JU000J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 138 137 136 131 138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 151
Write 142
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 135
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.6
206% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
44.6% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 13
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 14.2
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X580VD Builds (Compare 1,191 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X580VD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback