Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	89.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Asus Z10PE-D8 WS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z10PE-D8 WS
Memory	29.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160622
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 18 '17 at 19:10
Run Duration	106 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 466 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	65.4% Good	Memory 55.2 1-Core 112 2-Core 222 69% 130 Pts	4-Core 406 8-Core 707 67% 556 Pts	64-Core 1,864 115% 1,864 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 77%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 480GB-$198 165 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 412GB free Firmware: 00.Y Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 153 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 312 (A8) Unknown 100 100 117 (AA) Unknown 100 100 646 (AD) Unknown 100 100 196615 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 186 (C2) HDA temperature 74 65 150324969498 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 71 (DA) Unknown 100 100 71 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 1990 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1938 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1045 (F4) Unknown 100 100 3 (F5) Unknown 100 100 7 (F6) Unknown 100 100 536320	91.7% Outstanding	Read 522 Write 504 Mixed 515 115% 514 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 75.7 4K Mixed 12.8 97% 38.4 MB/s	DQ Read 247 DQ Write 309 DQ Mixed 13.6 84% 190 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 97%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 151GB free (System drive) Firmware: 00.r Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 28 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 140 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 503 (AD) Unknown 100 100 65542 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 393217 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 82 (C2) HDA temperature 72 67 141735428124 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 356 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 310 (F2) Unknown 100 100 222 (F4) Unknown 100 100 1 (F5) Unknown 100 100 6 (F6) Unknown 100 100 112704	89.3% Excellent	Read 525 Write 496 Mixed 515 114% 512 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 64.3 4K Mixed 8.44 87% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 315 DQ Write 304 DQ Mixed 13.9 92% 211 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 111%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$40 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 931GB free Firmware: 1A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 183 173 1833 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 378 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 75 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 297 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 202 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 308 (C2) HDA temperature 115 104 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	114% Outstanding	Read 221 Write 178 Mixed 172 143% 190 MB/s	4K Read 1.32 4K Write 2.77 4K Mixed 0.33 143% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x16GB 46,387 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.5% Below average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 12 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 12.8 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 143 28% 143 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 164%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z10PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 102%

UFO

System: Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v41stBench 65%, 987 samples	20x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples	20x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples	16x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	36x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	22x
GTX Titan XNvidia $615Bench 75%, 15,621 samples	19x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $152Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	13x
750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GBIntel $550Bench 186%, 8,641 samples	11x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	10x

RAM
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	21x
9ASF1G72PZ-2G6D1 8x8GBMicronBench 92%, 150 samples	12x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $637

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16