Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Memory 90.6 1-Core 65.3 2-Core 131 60% 95.6 Pts	4-Core 251 8-Core 349 38% 300 Pts	64-Core 349 22% 349 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K600 8,087 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 094B) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.96 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.89% Terrible	Lighting 4.37 Reflection 4.12 Parallax 4.34 4% 4.28 fps	MRender 5.05 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 7.04 4% 5.33 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.89% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 129GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB0Q Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.7% Average	Read 237 Write 153 Mixed 155 40% 182 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 30.6 4K Mixed 18.1 86% 26.4 MB/s	DQ Read 40.6 DQ Write 62.7 DQ Mixed 18.2 23% 40.5 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 126%
Maxtor STM3120814A 120GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 65GB free Firmware: 3.AAJ Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	28.9% Poor	Read 51.4 Write 49.3 Mixed 21.4 30% 40.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 0.99 4K Mixed 0.38 84% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 29%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 6 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	35.4% Below average	MC Read 12.8 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 10.3 33% 11.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 10.7 28% 9.87 GB/s	Latency 66.3 60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	19x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $137Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	13x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	12x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $375