HP ProBook 4440s

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ProBook 4440s  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 17F3
Memory6.8 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime2 Days
Run DateOct 20 '20 at 12:20
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
41.4% Average
Memory 55.8
1-Core 36.7
2-Core 56.5
33% 49.7 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 161
21% 159 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 17F3) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.29% Terrible
Lighting 3.67
Reflection 4.85
Parallax 2.53
3% 3.68 fps
MRender 4.38
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 6.96
4% 4.46 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.29%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
542GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 23 9.9 45 61 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 42.6
Write 31.1
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 35.7
22% 29.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.2
50% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 71%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
14GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.4 5.9 3.9 6.3 4.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 36.2
Write 5.7
Mixed 12.9
SusWrite 4.9
15% 14.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.4
109% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT125S6TFR8C-H9 Kingston 9905428-417.A00LF 10GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.9% Poor
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 9.8
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 7.8
23% 8.03 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 4440s Builds (Compare 182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 4440s

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback