Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics55.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory19.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateOct 19 '20 at 12:25
Run Duration285 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Memory 76.5
1-Core 153
2-Core 304
95% 178 Pts
4-Core 608
8-Core 1,129
104% 868 Pts
64-Core 2,169
134% 2,169 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Asus(1043 04D2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
55.2% Above average
Lighting 69
Reflection 70.2
Parallax 87
56% 75.4 fps
MRender 71.8
Gravity 69.9
Splatting 56.7
53% 66.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force GS 128GB-$150
118GB free
Firmware: 5.20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 126 129 130 129 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 328
Write 151
Mixed 190
SusWrite 128
44% 199 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 77.9
4K Mixed 35.2
131% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 150
115% 156 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 86%
AMD Radeon R3 240GB
53GB free
Firmware: P0422C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 79 79 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 481
Write 443
Mixed 393
SusWrite 117
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 93.1
4K Mixed 43
148% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 309
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 227
198% 292 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 90%
SABRENT 1TB
837GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT303.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2067 935 894 926 868 611 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
152GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 65 66 65 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 82
Write 73.5
Mixed 52.9
SusWrite 65.2
50% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 68%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
737GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 79 91 95 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 109
Write 93.7
Mixed 50.1
SusWrite 91.3
63% 86 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
170GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 135 137 136 133 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 151
Write 151
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 135
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 113%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
575GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 127 125 125 126 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
64% Good
Read 96.4
Write 106
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 126
73% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.6
165% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 64%
Great: 67%
SV SAFE 4TB
674GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 74 75 74 73 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.3% Below average
Read 82.7
Write 73.2
Mixed 58.1
SusWrite 74.3
96% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.2
109% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IRH2666D464L19/16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 33.7
99% 34.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 30.4
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 87.3
46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 9,609 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI) - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $978
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback