Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-UD3P  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130806
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 18 '20 at 15:29
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 75.2
1-Core 65.1
2-Core 127
54% 89 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 371
36% 299 Pts
64-Core 409
25% 409 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.3% Poor
Lighting 33.5
Reflection 27.4
Parallax 33.5
27% 31.5 fps
MRender 34
Gravity 35.3
Splatting 32
28% 33.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 128GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1111A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 235 358 347 236 198 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 391
Write 374
Mixed 274
SusWrite 273
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 33.6
4K Mixed 18
60% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 166
136% 194 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 91%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
104GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 143 143 143 143 143 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 462
Write 424
Mixed 356
SusWrite 174
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 34
110% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 147
138% 214 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
225GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 105 107 108 106 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 146
Write 87
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 106
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 112%
Samsung HD320KJ 320GB
127GB free
Firmware: CP100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 51 52 53 52 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 40.4
Write 41.1
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 51.9
30% 40.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMX8GX3M2A160 CMX8GX3M2A160 CMX4GX3M1A160 CMX4GX3M1A160 16GB
667, 667, 800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
45.2% Average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 16.9
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 11
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 90
44% 90 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-UD3P Builds (Compare 825 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $549
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback