Asus K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics19.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141211
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateOct 18 '20 at 05:57
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri)-$130
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Memory 40.6
1-Core 62.8
2-Core 111
40% 71.5 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 139
19% 141 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.55
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Lighting 24.2
Reflection 19.4
Parallax 22.3
20% 22 fps
MRender 27.5
Gravity 25
Splatting 19.4
19% 24 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 204 205 209 203 196 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.8% Good
Read 234
Write 219
Mixed 194
SusWrite 197
48% 211 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 51.4
4K Mixed 34.7
114% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 163
119% 155 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 123%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
385GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 137 137 138 137 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 123
Write 133
Mixed 79.9
SusWrite 135
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 109%
Multiple Card Reader 256GB
219GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 10 10 11 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
6.78% Terrible
Read 17.4
Write 10
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 10.2
16% 12.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
50% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 6.78%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
16.6% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 5.7
16% 5.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 6.5
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 200
20% 200 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $158
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback