Asus F1A55-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics21.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus F1A55-M LE  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '20 at 14:17
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3850 APU-$80
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
50% Average
Memory 69.5
1-Core 44.5
2-Core 89.3
43% 67.8 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 168
24% 174 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 50%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
Asus(1043 054F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1187 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.9.2
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Lighting 25
Reflection 28.7
Parallax 31.5
20% 28.4 fps
MRender 28.2
Gravity 24.4
Splatting 30.9
23% 27.9 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P190710b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 182 189 197 199 200 MB/s
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.5% Average
Read 192
Write 186
Mixed 184
SusWrite 188
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 23.4
84% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 28.1
DQ Write 40.1
DQ Mixed 28.5
23% 32.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1333KLH-4G 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
34.7% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 10.5
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 7.5
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A55-M LE Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A55-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback