Gigabyte GA-H55M-UD2H

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	11.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H55M-UD2H (all builds)
Memory	7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091202
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 17 '20 at 13:15
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	28%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X3440 6,034 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	66.3% Good	Memory 93.5 1-Core 60.4 2-Core 127 59% 93.7 Pts	4-Core 222 8-Core 267 32% 244 Pts	64-Core 306 19% 306 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E353) CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.9.2 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	53.2% Above average	Lighting 67.4 Reflection 65.5 Parallax 81.7 55% 71.5 fps	MRender 64.7 Gravity 66.2 Splatting 54.5 50% 61.8 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z32080RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 24 23 28 20 25 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	11.4% Very poor	Read 43.3 Write 20.8 Mixed 32.3 SusWrite 24.8 7% 30.3 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 29.9 4K Mixed 0.1 24% 11.7 MB/s	DQ Read 8.4 DQ Write 72.8 DQ Mixed 8.6 16% 29.9 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 78%
WD Purple 3TB (2014)-$85 6,631 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 874GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 25 27 29 25 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	33.7% Below average	Read 89.7 Write 94.9 Mixed 50.5 SusWrite 27.3 48% 65.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.4% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 13.5 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 10.4 SC Mixed 10.4 28% 9.97 GB/s	Latency 61 66% 61 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H55M-UD2H Builds (Compare 429 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H55M-UD2H

CPU
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	53x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	53x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	46x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	36x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	22x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	17x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	10x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	78x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	70x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	56x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $128

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16