MSI MEG Z390 ACE (MS-7B12)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 178%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 178%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics178% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B12
MotherboardMSI MEG Z390 ACE (MS-7B12)  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191230
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 17 '20 at 12:36
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$409
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 97.4
1-Core 150
2-Core 297
100% 181 Pts
4-Core 560
8-Core 1,030
95% 795 Pts
64-Core 1,545
96% 1,545 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
178% Outstanding
Lighting 248
Reflection 273
Parallax 350
202% 290 fps
MRender 331
Gravity 250
Splatting 141
186% 241 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 178%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 309 351 346 345 356 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 26.2
Write 1,876
Mixed 1,053
SusWrite 334
191% 822 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 85.4
4K Mixed 56.5
153% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 911
DQ Write 841
DQ Mixed 951
693% 901 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 109%
Great: 302%
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
477GB free
Firmware: RVM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 449 473 477 479 479 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 478
Mixed 445
SusWrite 451
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 93.9
4K Mixed 52.7
175% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 351
265% 354 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 118%
Great: 133%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$192
2TB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1411 1395 1387 1392 1390 1380 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 1,318
Write 1,466
Mixed 1,039
SusWrite 1,392
294% 1,304 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 68.3
232% 83.4 MB/s
DQ Read 795
DQ Write 910
DQ Mixed 307
382% 671 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 248%
Great: 282%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$222
5.5TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 207 225 214 218 210 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 217
Write 217
Mixed 81.9
SusWrite 215
133% 183 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.7
229% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 124%
Great: 121%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$222
5.5TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 214 220 215 217 218 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 218
Write 226
Mixed 87.7
SusWrite 217
136% 187 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.8
242% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 125%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 4000 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 41.7
MC Write 44.9
MC Mixed 34
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 48.9
SC Mixed 31.4
97% 33.8 GB/s
Latency 48.6
82% 48.6 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 113%
Great: 149%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG Z390 ACE (MS-7B12) Builds (Compare 3,163 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG Z390 ACE (MS-7B12) - $243

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $1,296
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback