| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
| Graphics | 62.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 92.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Biostar TP67B+ (all builds) |
| Memory | 14.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120706 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 17 '17 at 01:21 |
| Run Duration | 84 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
|
91.7%
Outstanding
|
89% 157 Pts
|
66% 495 Pts
|
31% 499 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 381.65
|
62.1%
Good
|
64% 74.1 fps
|
59% 72 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
92.9%
Outstanding
|
113% 505 MB/s
|
112% 39 MB/s
|
111% 160 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1866C10D3/8G 16GB
1867, 1867 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
73.2%
Very good
|
72% 25.2 GB/s
|
60% 21.2 GB/s
|
85% 47.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TP67B+ Builds (Compare 39 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Biostar TP67B+
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 13x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 6x |
| Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 3x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 3x |
| GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $886 |