| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 61.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 88.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Biostar TP67B+ (all builds) |
| Memory | 14.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120706 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 16 '17 at 16:40 |
| Run Duration | 89 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
66.4%
Good
|
48% 71.6 Pts
|
37% 288 Pts
|
22% 349 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 381.65
|
61.8%
Good
|
63% 76 fps
|
59% 72 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
88.3%
Excellent
|
113% 504 MB/s
|
116% 41 MB/s
|
43% 56.6 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1866C10D3/8G 16GB
1867, 1867 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
67.7%
Good
|
71% 24.9 GB/s
|
44% 15.3 GB/s
|
57% 69.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TP67B+ Builds (Compare 39 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Biostar TP67B+
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 13x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 6x |
| Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 3x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 3x |
| GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $886 |