MSI Z170A GAMING PRO (MS-7984)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7984
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING PRO (MS-7984)  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display4096x2160x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180616
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateOct 16 '20 at 20:45
Run Duration300 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600-$107
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 91.2
1-Core 122
2-Core 235
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 465
62% 465 Pts
64-Core 464
29% 464 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
XFX(1682 9275) 2GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Lighting 40.2
Reflection 32.3
Parallax 48
33% 40.2 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
392GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 474
Write 388
Mixed 311
87% 391 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 45.4
176% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 244
203% 294 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Hitachi HDN726040ALE614 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: APGNW7JH
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 191
Write 195
Mixed 76.8
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 113%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$70
33GB free
Firmware: 0005DEM1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 103
Write 104
Mixed 59
66% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
105% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
Samsung HD160HJ 160GB
0GB free
Firmware: BF100-11
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 72.5
Write 2.2
Mixed 45.4
30% 40 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 42%
Intenso External USB 3.0 3TB
33GB free
Firmware: 5438
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 134 133 133 134 133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 138
Write 131
Mixed 87.1
SusWrite 133
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 93%
Intenso External USB 3.0 3TB
473GB free
Firmware: 5438
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 116 114 118 118 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 164
Write 172
Mixed 142
SusWrite 117
110% 149 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.8
297% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 93%
HGST HDN 726040ALE614 4TB
563GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 213
Write 213
Mixed 91.4
210% 173 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.9
222% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 84%
TOSHIBA DT01ABA300 3TB
10GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 112 136 136 136 136 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.8% Above average
Read 151
Write 136
Mixed 38
SusWrite 131
148% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 57%
TOSHIBA HDWQ140 4TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 136 136 136 135 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.7% Good
Read 165
Write 173
Mixed 96
SusWrite 134
190% 142 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
154% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 63%
TOSHIBA DT01ABA300 3TB
50GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 19 0.5 0.3 0.2 1.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.8% Very poor
Read 72
Write 63.8
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 4.4
47% 39.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 57%
Toshiba StorE HDD 500GB
37GB free, PID 0b16
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
23.2% Poor
Read 39.7
Write 37.6
Mixed 33
SusWrite 38.2
50% 37.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
139% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 21%
TOSHIBA HDWQ140 4TB
463GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 121 119 120 120 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 162
Write 166
Mixed 89
SusWrite 119
177% 134 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
147% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2400C17-4GIS 8313 CL15-15-15 D4-2400 04CD F4-2400C17-4GIS 8313 CL15-15-15 D4-2400 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.1% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 25.4
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 22.7
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A GAMING PRO (MS-7984) Builds (Compare 1,239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING PRO (MS-7984) - $174

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $768
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback