Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10  (all builds)
Memory17.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160913
Uptime11.8 Days
Run DateDec 07 '17 at 02:18
Run Duration553 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 89
1-Core 105
2-Core 250
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 717
74% 597 Pts
64-Core 1,208
75% 1,208 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Lighting 147
Reflection 151
Parallax 130
120% 143 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 137
Splatting 108
98% 120 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,884
Write 1,191
Mixed 1,337
326% 1,471 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 31.9
174% 67.9 MB/s
DQ Read 47.3
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 30.8
64% 121 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 207%
Great: 283%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
52GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 504
Write 349
Mixed 354
89% 402 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 68.1
4K Mixed 26.6
129% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 41.6
DQ Write 76.9
DQ Mixed 21
27% 46.5 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 126%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
920GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 99.9
Write 100
Mixed 91.8
73% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.42
112% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 51%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
596GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 107
Write 97.9
Mixed 101
77% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 2.58
4K Mixed 0.38
115% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59%
Great: 62%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
331GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 65
Write 69
Mixed 63
49% 65.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.34
95% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 51%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
60GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 58.5
Write 44.3
Mixed 54.1
40% 52.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 2.34
4K Mixed 0.42
120% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 62%
HGST HDN 726040ALE614 4TB
3.5TB free, PID null
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 201
Write 188
Mixed 130
215% 173 MB/s
4K Read 1.03
4K Write 4.52
4K Mixed 0.4
171% 1.98 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 84%
HGST HDN 726040ALE614 4TB
3.5TB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74% Very good
Read 170
Write 160
Mixed 137
197% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.99
4K Write 4.61
4K Mixed 0.42
175% 2.01 MB/s
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 137
Write 141
Mixed 97.3
158% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 2.33
4K Mixed 0.28
90% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 61%
HGST HDN 726040ALE614 4TB
2TB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.4% Good
Read 165
Write 141
Mixed 131
182% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.96
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.43
158% 1.83 MB/s
WDC WD10 EARS-00Y5B1 1TB
895GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
24.4% Poor
Read 56.3
Write 53.9
Mixed 43.7
65% 51.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.15
55% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 43%
WDC WD60 EZRX-00MVLB1 6TB
706GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 120
Write 118
Mixed 121
154% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 2.29
4K Mixed 0.19
87% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 64%
HGST HDN 726040ALE614 4TB
610GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
60% Above average
Read 135
Write 135
Mixed 124
169% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.05
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.29
133% 1.61 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 60%
Great: 70%
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB
608GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 73.4
Write 70.8
Mixed 65.6
89% 69.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.28
4K Mixed 0.23
54% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 42%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
542GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 134
Write 118
Mixed 117
156% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 2.15
4K Mixed 0.2
82% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 61%
WDC WD10 EARS-00Y5B1 1TB
229GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 67.4
Write 79.7
Mixed 57.1
88% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.14
53% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 43%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00RWYB1 6TB
56GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.6% Above average
Read 143
Write 133
Mixed 116
165% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 2.23
4K Mixed 0.25
86% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 62%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
22GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 129
Write 86
Mixed 96.2
126% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 2.13
4K Mixed 0.22
82% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.9% Good
MC Read 27
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 21.5
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 17
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 Builds (Compare 1,051 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $290

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $1,571
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback