Asus ROG STRIX Z490-E GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive342% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z490-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory57.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '20 at 19:29
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User PYF-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$430
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Memory 82.8
1-Core 157
2-Core 312
98% 184 Pts
4-Core 609
8-Core 1,217
108% 913 Pts
64-Core 2,061
128% 2,061 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.38
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 158
Reflection 151
Parallax 151
128% 153 fps
Gravity 133
Splatting 107
104% 120 fps
Poor: 105% Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
610GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2305 2054 1494 1534 1546 1520 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
342% Outstanding
Read 2,568
Write 2,217
Mixed 1,783
SusWrite 1,742
466% 2,078 MB/s
4K Read 60.3
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 83.5
276% 96.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,187
DQ Write 909
DQ Mixed 1,061
790% 1,052 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 342%
Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
706GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1295 1330 1317 1326 1307 1312 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
271% Outstanding
Read 1,312
Write 1,156
Mixed 1,082
SusWrite 1,314
274% 1,216 MB/s
4K Read 62
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 83.9
275% 94.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,281
DQ Write 1,085
DQ Mixed 1,171
881% 1,179 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 271%
Great: 410%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 16TB
15TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 369 366 364 373 370 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 326
Write 339
Mixed 84
SusWrite 369
202% 280 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 2
527% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 200%
Great: 208%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$80
681GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 90 90 90 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
62% Good
Read 127
Write 114
Mixed 98.1
SusWrite 89
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 62%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.7% Very good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 21.7
70% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 30.1
SC Mixed 24.2
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z490-E GAMING Builds (Compare 10,466 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 178%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 177%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z490-E GAMING - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $1,334
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback