Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	58.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	367% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	21.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181102
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 16 '20 at 09:32
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375 28,524 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	92.3% Outstanding	Memory 80.2 1-Core 140 2-Core 281 90% 167 Pts	4-Core 559 8-Core 1,016 94% 788 Pts	64-Core 1,533 95% 1,533 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EA) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 451.67 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	58.4% Above average	Lighting 65.9 Reflection 76.1 Parallax 61.8 54% 67.9 fps	MRender 94.2 Gravity 65.9 Splatting 86 67% 82 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1976 2011 2015 2034 1476 1456 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	367% Outstanding	Read 2,656 Write 2,181 Mixed 1,846 SusWrite 1828 477% 2,128 MB/s	4K Read 67.5 4K Write 184 4K Mixed 97.2 324% 116 MB/s	DQ Read 1,157 DQ Write 996 DQ Mixed 1,080 808% 1,077 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 367% Great: 435%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 634GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 493 494 493 494 494 493 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	133% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 494 Mixed 470 SusWrite 494 111% 492 MB/s	4K Read 45.5 4K Write 129 4K Mixed 60.1 214% 78.1 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 356 269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 133%
WD Gold 6TB (2016) -$183 2,043 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.01M03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 148 152 147 149 151 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Read 162 Write 178 Mixed 82.3 SusWrite 149 105% 143 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 0.7 219% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 121%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 8x4GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 120% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	113% Outstanding	MC Read 34.9 MC Write 64.8 MC Mixed 35.7 129% 45.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 24.8 SC Mixed 11.7 44% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 80.2 50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 104% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 144%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	81x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	72x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	63x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	54x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	41x
F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 85%, 19,774 samples	23x

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $1,343

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16