Asrock A88M-G/3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock A88M-G/3.1  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160505
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '20 at 22:25
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 97%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6400K APU-$81
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 88.6
1-Core 51.5
2-Core 96
52% 78.7 Pts
4-Core 102
8-Core 94.2
13% 98.1 Pts
64-Core 98.9
6% 98.9 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250E
XFX(1682 7251) 1GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.9.2
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 12.1
Reflection 13.6
Parallax 16.6
10% 14.1 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 11
Splatting 16.3
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 80 91 104 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 94.3
Write 98.8
Mixed 66
SusWrite 92.1
65% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 70%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
455GB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 64 67 70 69 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 116
Write 122
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 67.6
65% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
131GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 64 67 70 69 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 75
Write 63
Mixed 49.8
SusWrite 67.1
47% 63.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
3.5TB free
Firmware: CC34
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 51
Write 50.5
Mixed 35
34% 45.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 61%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
3.5TB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 157 166 175 182 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 172
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 169
101% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1.7
304% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 99%
Great: 61%
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB
217GB free, PID ce15
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 36 36 37 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 36
Write 34.3
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 35.6
45% 33.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D18ADS3.16FE 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.5% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 10.3
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 9.8
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88M-G/3.1 Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock A88M-G/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback