Asus Zephyrus S GX701GW_GX701GW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics86.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive146% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus Zephyrus S GX701GW_GX701GW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GX701GW
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200422
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateOct 15 '20 at 20:00
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 89.4
1-Core 122
2-Core 237
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 694
71% 576 Pts
64-Core 836
52% 836 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
Asus(1043 1F2E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.3% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 108
Parallax 107
83% 105 fps
MRender 157
Gravity 100
Splatting 92.2
92% 116 fps
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 97%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 146 56 57 59 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 1,286
Write 911
Mixed 816
SusWrite 112
173% 781 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 62.4
212% 74 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 638
DQ Mixed 216
241% 396 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 146%
Great: 209%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
77.6% Very good
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 22.7
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 25.4
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Zephyrus S GX701GW_GX701GW Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

System: Asus Zephyrus S GX701GW_GX701GW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback