ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP 460-p009ns

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	89.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP 460-p009ns (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 81B4
Memory	13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181120
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 15 '20 at 18:24
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400T 8,631 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Memory 80.3 1-Core 88.1 2-Core 169 66% 112 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 322 43% 323 Pts	64-Core 322 20% 322 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 36F7) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.72% Terrible	Lighting 4.37 Reflection 4.35 Parallax 4.19 4% 4.3 fps	MRender 4.14 Gravity 3.93 Splatting 6.17 4% 4.75 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.72% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 170GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKJ1A3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 432 431 34 346 157 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Read 388 Write 393 Mixed 345 SusWrite 300 80% 357 MB/s	4K Read 33.1 4K Write 82.2 4K Mixed 38.4 143% 51.2 MB/s	DQ Read 239 DQ Write 306 DQ Mixed 186 165% 244 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 100%
Jmicron Generic 500GB 2,959 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 341GB free Firmware: 0405 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 101 102 102 102 102 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	58.9% Above average	Read 106 Write 94.1 Mixed 39.1 SusWrite 99 62% 84.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 63%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 753GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 176 176 178 178 177 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	92.8% Outstanding	Read 147 Write 153 Mixed 79.7 SusWrite 176 102% 139 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 218% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 92.8% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 2401 V1BL-4AFP00 16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	MC Read 26.5 MC Write 29 MC Mixed 22.2 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 29.7 SC Mixed 21.8 64% 22.3 GB/s	Latency 80.1 50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback