Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.62% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '20 at 16:42
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 91.6
1-Core 148
2-Core 269
95% 170 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 579
66% 517 Pts
64-Core 580
36% 580 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6793
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.62% Terrible
Lighting 6.37
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 8.25
5% 8.49 fps
MRender 11.7
Gravity 6.77
Splatting 14.7
9% 11.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.62%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NE-256 256GB
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111H0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 958 968 977 360 161 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1,430
Write 905
Mixed 754
SusWrite 598
205% 922 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 23.4
202% 87 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 718
DQ Mixed 338
317% 480 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 175%
Great: 234%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA266.C8FD1 07FB GSA8G4SCL196P-26 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
83.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 23.4
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 25.3
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,722 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback