Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4125 2,594 User benchmarks, average bench 35% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	31.9% Below average	Memory 37.3 1-Core 41.4 2-Core 100 33% 59.6 Pts	4-Core 153 8-Core 153 20% 153 Pts	64-Core 155 10% 155 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.14% Terrible	Lighting 1.53 Reflection 1.77 Parallax 1.66 1% 1.65 fps	MRender 2.33 Gravity 1.53 Splatting 0.04 1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.14% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Faspeed K7N8-128G 128GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0924A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 52 36 23 28 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 381 Write 174 Mixed 222 SusWrite 50.5 46% 207 MB/s	4K Read 14.9 4K Write 53.3 4K Mixed 12 66% 26.7 MB/s	DQ Read 68.5 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 30.7 50% 91.9 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 73%
SD Card 2GB 2,438 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 3.8 6.5 6.7 6.9 6.7 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	4.53% Terrible	Read 17.5 Write 1.2 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 5.9 8% 7.45 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.3 20% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.53% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	26.2% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 11.7 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 4 10% 3.63 GB/s	Latency 215 19% 215 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N5095IntelBench 43%, 1,699 samples	4x
Celeron J4115IntelBench 34%, 544 samples	4x
Celeron J4125IntelBench 35%, 2,594 samples	2x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	6x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 4,536 samples	4x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16