Asus PRIME H370M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive93.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME H370M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 15 '20 at 00:14
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500-$165
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Memory 89.5
1-Core 130
2-Core 258
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 752
79% 632 Pts
64-Core 723
45% 723 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8783
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 8.22
6% 9.04 fps
Gravity 7
Splatting 15.7
11% 11.3 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$36
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 303 304 260 125 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 320
Mixed 306
SusWrite 236
75% 338 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 92.1
4K Mixed 36.2
146% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 247
212% 313 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 128%
Kimtigo 240GB 240GB
152GB free
Firmware: R0327B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 431 431 194 65 54 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 493
Write 431
Mixed 346
SusWrite 268
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 21.2
118% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 29.5
77% 155 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 102%
ST310005 24AS 1TB
35GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 71 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 65.2
Write 67.2
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 70.5
88% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 43%
ST2000DM 001-1CH164 2TB
19GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 0.7 0.4 0 0.1 1.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
24.1% Poor
Read 128
Write 79.5
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 0.7
84% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 73%
ST2000DM 006-2DM164 2TB
2TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 71 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 202
Write 149
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 70.8
157% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 25.9
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 25.6
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H370M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,129 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H370M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $310
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback