TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock H61M-DGS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120221
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 14 '20 at 23:08
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 81.6
2-Core 160
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 308
42% 314 Pts
64-Core 323
20% 323 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑
This bench: 68.5%
 Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5400
Sapphire(174B 6000) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.18% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 1.88
Parallax 1.62
1% 1.63 fps
MRender 1.86
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.91
1% 1.56 fps
Poor: 1% ↑
This bench: 1.18%
 Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 64GB 64GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 228 237 241 242 242 MB/s
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66.4% Good
Read 256
Write 236
Mixed 219
SusWrite 237
53% 237 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 29.9
106% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 160
131% 187 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 66.4%
 Great: 84%
WD WD7500AARX-00N0YB0 750GB
119GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 43 49 53 54 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 93.8
Write 85.8
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 52.9
58% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑
This bench: 42.2%
 Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB DDR3 SPECTEK 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.8% Poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 6.7
20% 6.97 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 6.4
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 17% ↑
This bench: 22.8%
 Great: 25%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical H61M-DGS Builds (Compare 1,045 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-DGS - $68

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel  $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples160x
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples102x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples79x
GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples117x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples80x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples54x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples62x
A400 120GBKingston  $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples27x
BX500 240GBCrucial  $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples18x
RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples22x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples13x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples12x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback