Acer Veriton N260G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 6%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Veriton N260G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer FGN40M
Memory1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '20 at 21:19
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 69%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N280
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Memory 27.2
1-Core 5.8
2-Core 7.6
11% 13.5 Pts
4-Core 8.4
8-Core 9.9
1% 9.15 Pts
64-Core 10.7
1% 10.7 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 32%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Mobile Intel 45 Express Chipset Family
Acer(1025 0268) 783MB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1749
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
0.16% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.27
Parallax 0.41
0% 0.33 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.16%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS543216L9A300 160GB-$99
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FB2OC40C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 31 17 39 42 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 41.7
Write 35.8
Mixed 25
SusWrite 35.7
25% 34.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
74% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 35%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
12GB free, PID 0121
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.6 4.1 5.2 5.4 5.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
3.56% Terrible
Read 13.3
Write 2
Mixed 2.8
SusWrite 4.8
6% 5.73 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.56%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GU332G0ALEPR8H2C6F 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2 667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
6.91% Terrible
MC Read 2.4
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 1.8
6% 2.23 GB/s
SC Read 1
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 1.2
5% 1.63 GB/s
Latency 272
15% 272 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.91%
Great: 12%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton N260G Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 6%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton N260G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback