Casper EXCALIBUR G670

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive154% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemCasper EXCALIBUR G670  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER G670 001
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180817
Uptime16 Days
Run DateOct 14 '20 at 19:43
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 66.7
2-Core 134
58% 94.3 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 428
43% 347 Pts
64-Core 557
34% 557 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Quanta(152D 1188) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4587
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Lighting 39.1
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 33.5
32% 34.1 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 40.5
Splatting 35.9
31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 820 832 794 444 54 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 1,346
Write 934
Mixed 834
SusWrite 509
202% 906 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 75.6
4K Mixed 50.8
168% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 329
DQ Write 412
DQ Mixed 222
209% 321 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 154%
Great: 209%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100M 1TB
616GB free
Firmware: AX1P1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 105 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 99.3
Write 100
Mixed 33.7
SusWrite 105
61% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 61%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
10GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 2.5 3.7 3.9 4 4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
6.55% Terrible
Read 21.3
Write 15.3
Mixed 15.5
SusWrite 3.4
17% 13.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.6
89% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.55%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6D1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.8% Very good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 22.5
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 18.7
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EXCALIBUR G670 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Casper EXCALIBUR G670

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback