Asrock X570 Creator

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 147%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Creator  (all builds)
Memory50.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200827
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 14 '20 at 15:19
Run Duration349 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$495
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 69.6
1-Core 148
2-Core 295
90% 171 Pts
4-Core 585
8-Core 1147
102% 866 Pts
64-Core 2,740
170% 2,740 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Lighting 181
Reflection 192
Parallax 174
148% 183 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 176
Splatting 125
115% 142 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid WDS200T3X0C-00SJ 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1024
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1870 1931 1289 1309 1303 1311 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
244% Outstanding
Read 1,571
Write 2,141
Mixed 1,562
SusWrite 1,502
383% 1,694 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 49.2
185% 74.9 MB/s
DQ Read 492
DQ Write 982
DQ Mixed 659
523% 711 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 244%
Great: 323%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 189 193 196 198 197 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 364
Write 258
Mixed 228
SusWrite 194
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 24.2
82% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 45.5
DQ Mixed 53.2
47% 73.3 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 129%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
222GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 398 400 403 398 398 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 432
Mixed 413
SusWrite 398
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 92.4
4K Mixed 57.4
185% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 203
153% 205 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 111%
Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
141GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 398 401 404 398 398 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 447
Mixed 448
SusWrite 398
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 91.3
4K Mixed 53.4
177% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 205
154% 206 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 109%
Great: 133%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
69GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 451 454 457 457 456 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 439
Write 434
Mixed 428
SusWrite 452
99% 438 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 29.9
96% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 231
174% 236 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
288GB free
Firmware: CC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 175 176 178 178 177 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 139
Write 95.5
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 174
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 112%
OWC SoftRAID 32TB
27.5TB free
Firmware: RA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 42 44 44 42 43 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lacie Rugged USB-C 2TB
59GB free
Firmware: 1153
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 77 85 79 86 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 28.7
Write 96.5
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 83.3
48% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 1
234% 2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 67%
Lacie Rugged Mini USB3 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 153E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 100 101 101 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 74.5
Write 98.8
Mixed 68
SusWrite 102
63% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.6
182% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 69%
TS-RDF5 SD Transcend 32GB
30GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 16 16 15 16 16 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 90.3
Write 23
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 16.2
43% 40.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 3.2
191% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 28%
Drobo 5D3 70.5TB
48TB free, PID 3533
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 38 30 37 33 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
28% Poor
Read 29.3
Write 42
Mixed 26
SusWrite 33.5
46% 32.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 2.6
271% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 28%
Great: 122%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB
12GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 66 65 66 66 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 90.7
Write 65.5
Mixed 70
SusWrite 65.7
96% 73 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 4.1
267% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.2% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 26.1
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 27.1
62% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Creator Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 181%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 228%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Creator

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,261
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback