Asrock H61M-DGS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics47.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120221
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 14 '20 at 14:23
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400S-$70
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 69.3
1-Core 80
2-Core 141
57% 96.8 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 265
36% 267 Pts
64-Core 257
16% 257 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1270 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.1.3
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
47.5% Average
Lighting 58.6
Reflection 64.4
Parallax 71.8
48% 64.9 fps
MRender 64.3
Gravity 56.7
Splatting 53.8
47% 58.3 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 96 95 92 93 72 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.2% Below average
Read 163
Write 160
Mixed 146
SusWrite 89.9
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 18.1
75% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 20.8
DQ Write 39.2
DQ Mixed 21.1
18% 27 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-034.A00LF 9905471-011.A00LF 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.1% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 12.5
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 10.8
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-DGS Builds (Compare 1,049 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-DGS - $68

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback