HP Mini 110-3000

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Mini 110-3000  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 148A
Memory0.1 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100625
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 14 '20 at 12:45
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N450
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Memory 35.4
1-Core 5.7
2-Core 11.7
14% 17.6 Pts
4-Core 9.1
8-Core 9.6
1% 9.35 Pts
64-Core 8.8
0% 8.8 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9160314AS 160GB
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 38 53 54 41 49 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 43.5
Write 36.2
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 42.6
28% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 41444F564631413038334632472020202020 1x1GB
1 of 1 slots used
1GB SODIMM DDR2 667 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
3.92% Terrible
MC Read 0.6
MC Write 2.1
MC Mixed 0.7
3% 1.13 GB/s
SC Read 0.1
SC Write 0
SC Mixed 0.1
0% 0.07 GB/s
Latency 225
18% 225 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.92%
Great: 9%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback