Zoostorm 7200-5200A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemZoostorm 7200-5200A  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160614
Uptime8.6 Days
Run DateOct 14 '20 at 10:40
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
44.3% Average
Memory 55.5
1-Core 65.9
2-Core 109
46% 76.9 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 188
26% 191 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
MSI(1462 7721) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.8.3
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.23% Terrible
Lighting 7.63
Reflection 8.35
Parallax 9.75
6% 8.58 fps
MRender 6.52
Gravity 7.27
Splatting 8.61
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.23%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
179GB free
Firmware: X41100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 225 192 198 198 200 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 384
Write 362
Mixed 284
SusWrite 228
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 36.1
129% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 220
172% 237 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 101%
SanDisk Z400s 128GB-$109
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2333000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 23 25 23 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 46% Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.M16 Team-Elite-1600 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
35.6% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 14.6
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 10.3
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7200-5200A Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Zoostorm 7200-5200A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $109
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback