Zoostorm 7200-5200A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemZoostorm 7200-5200A  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160614
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '20 at 22:25
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
42.7% Average
Memory 54.2
1-Core 29.6
2-Core 88.2
35% 57.3 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 174
24% 178 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
MSI(1462 7721) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.8.3
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.24% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 8.31
Parallax 9.66
6% 8.52 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 7.27
Splatting 8.57
6% 7.61 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.24%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
192GB free
Firmware: X41100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 242 195 199 199 200 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 394
Write 354
Mixed 284
SusWrite 227
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 31.6
123% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 219
170% 235 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 101%
SanDisk Z400s 128GB-$109
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2333000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 19 19 23 21 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 46% Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.M16 Team-Elite-1600 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
36.9% Below average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 14.9
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 11.3
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7200-5200A Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Zoostorm 7200-5200A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $109
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback