TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Predator PH315-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive47.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Predator PH315-51  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Sienta_CFS
Memory12.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180713
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 14 '20 at 09:34
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
28.2% Poor
Memory 39.1
1-Core 30
2-Core 55.3
26% 41.5 Pts
4-Core 94.1
8-Core 139
15% 116 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 28.2%
 Great: 80%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1263) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
12.8% Very poor
Lighting 10
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 26.6
8% 16.1 fps
MRender 27.7
Gravity 26.1
Splatting 26.2
22% 26.7 fps
Poor: 21% ↑
This bench: 12.8%
 Great: 31%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1262) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5018
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.12% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 5.47
4% 7.34 fps
MRender 8.14
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 11.5
7% 8.35 fps
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 5.12%
 Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 122 98 127 130 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 365
Write 131
Mixed 148
SusWrite 123
42% 192 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 28
4K Mixed 15.3
62% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 88.9
80% 125 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 47.1%
 Great: 70%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
583GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 94 91 90 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 96
Write 78.5
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 94
52% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 54.5%
 Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
39% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 17.1
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 8.3
24% 8.23 GB/s
Latency 206
19% 206 ns
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 39%
 Great: 82%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Predator PH315-51 Builds (Compare 3,787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-51

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples2,439x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples1,348x
GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples2,005x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples1,255x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples527x
SSD
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples789x
760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel  $33Bench 190%, 20,095 samples522x
RBUSNS8180DS3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 57%, 4,156 samples438x
RAM
ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 17,072 samples646x
ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 42%, 19,360 samples348x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 28,425 samples302x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback