HP Z820 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory80GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 80GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z820 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158B
Memory72.1 GB free of 80 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191028
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateOct 14 '20 at 09:11
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 76.3
1-Core 77.2
2-Core 142
59% 98.5 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 541
51% 423 Pts
64-Core 1,116
69% 1,116 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820
HP(103C 1096) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Lighting 24.3
Reflection 27
Parallax 34.4
20% 28.6 fps
MRender 39.5
Gravity 30
Splatting 27.5
26% 32.3 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
266GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 408 407 416 414 416 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 448
Write 398
Mixed 405
SusWrite 413
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 39.4
4K Mixed 30.6
99% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 222
172% 236 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 125%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90
1TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 135 128 134 136 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 145
Write 135
Mixed 87.8
SusWrite 134
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36JSF2G72PZ-1G9E1 5x16GB
5 of 16 slots used
80GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.1% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 7.9
23% 8.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.4
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 87.7
46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z820 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,766 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Z820 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback