Samsung 850XBC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics74.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemSamsung 850XBC  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NT850XBX-GD7AH
Memory59.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '20 at 07:17
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 90.3
1-Core 129
2-Core 257
88% 159 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 710
73% 587 Pts
64-Core 839
52% 839 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
Sanyo(144D C17B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
74.5% Very good
Lighting 90.4
Reflection 98.2
Parallax 89.6
74% 92.7 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 79.1
Splatting 80.5
76% 95.4 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
752GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1907 2075 1184 1174 1172 1178 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 956
Write 2,220
Mixed 978
SusWrite 1,448
319% 1,401 MB/s
4K Read 58.1
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 73.2
244% 82.9 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 1,009
DQ Mixed 1,134
732% 821 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 232%
Great: 372%
Mtros SSD 1TB
944GB free
Firmware: S0618A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 399 400 400 399 398 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 496
Write 410
Mixed 373
SusWrite 402
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 70.4
4K Mixed 28.5
112% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 22.8
DQ Write 71.6
DQ Mixed 25.2
26% 39.9 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 219%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
794GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 123 128 130 130 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 77.5
Write 126
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 128
71% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
85.6% Excellent
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 26.8
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 35.1
SC Mixed 26.1
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 850XBC Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

System: Samsung 850XBC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback