Gigabyte GA-H97M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H97M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '20 at 17:14
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 114
2-Core 209
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 596
58% 479 Pts
64-Core 592
37% 592 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Asus(1043 84DD) 2GB
CLim: 1398 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Lighting 23.5
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 21.5
19% 21.1 fps
MRender 26.6
Gravity 23.9
Splatting 18
18% 22.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Klevv NEO N510+ 24 240GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 3.3 23 25 9.4 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.8% Poor
Read 292
Write 39.4
Mixed 30.1
SusWrite 15.9
20% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 23.2
4K Mixed 2.2
50% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 5.8
DQ Mixed 6.1
17% 39.3 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 45%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
1TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 101 101 102 103 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 110
Write 102
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 101
70% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 63%
WD WD6402AAEX-00Z3A0 640GB
541GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 103 103 105 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 112
Write 98.2
Mixed 74.6
SusWrite 104
72% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 76%
ACASIS 500GB
153GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 42 41 41 42 41 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 40.6
Write 28.4
Mixed 36.3
SusWrite 41
49% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-149.A01LF KHX1600C9D3LK2/8GX 9905403-149.A01LF KHX1600C9D3LK2/8GX 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.3
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 15.5
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H97M-D3H Builds (Compare 2,158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97M-D3H - $84

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $334
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback