Apple MacBookPro16,2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacBookPro16,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-5F9802EFE386AA28
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200712
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 12 '20 at 16:26
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1068NG7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 69.7
1-Core 144
2-Core 280
88% 164 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 660
74% 580 Pts
64-Core 628
39% 628 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus Graphics
Apple(106B 0211) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7870
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 18
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 14.3
15% 16.7 fps
MRender 17.5
Gravity 17.9
Splatting 31.3
19% 22.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP1024 1TB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 717.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1234 1095 1266 996 1067 934 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT53E1G32D4NQ-053 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 46.9
MC Write 47.1
MC Mixed 41
129% 45 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 44.3
SC Mixed 29.6
87% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 102%
This bench: 119%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro16,2 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Apple MacBookPro16,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback