Intel Emerald Lake

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIntel HuronRiver Platform
MotherboardIntel Emerald Lake  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '20 at 16:17
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 75.8
1-Core 54.9
2-Core 116
51% 82.2 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 296
32% 257 Pts
64-Core 237
15% 237 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Acer(1025 0507) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2792
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.85% Terrible
Lighting 2.03
Reflection 3.12
Parallax 1.38
2% 2.17 fps
MRender 2.81
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 3.83
2% 2.58 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.85%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Klevv NEO N500 240GB
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0330A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 12 40 43 34 9.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 265
Write 26.4
Mixed 314
SusWrite 39.4
36% 161 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 25.3
103% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 1.5
44% 104 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT425S6CFR6A-PB Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
40.2% Average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 12
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 12.1
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Emerald Lake Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel Emerald Lake

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback